The general idea behind an organic certification:
- Respect for living ecosystems and animal welfare
- Maintenance of a high degree of biodiversity and conservation of soil fertility
- Ban of the chemical synthetic pesticides and GMOs
- Responsible management of natural resources
- No use of synthetic additives or industrial solvents
In general, organic food is better for your health and for the environment. It’s closer to nature and destroying less of it.
The problem with certifications is that there have to be rules to create the boundaries of the certificate. And sometimes, you can fall just outside of these boundaries while still having the best of intentions.
Another problem is that, to apply for it and maintain the certificate, you need to pay. That makes it easy for large corporations, and much harder for small independent farmers and producers, who sometimes just don’t apply for it because of the costs.
- Some of these small producers even go far beyond the definition of organic, using ancient methods in balance with nature, but don’t fit within the certificate because of one particular rule.
- Other companies or large farms do fit within the certificate, but stretch to the limits of the rules, finding ways to produce as much as possible by (almost) cheating.
So what I’m trying to say is, “organic” doesn’t always mean the same thing. There are organic labeled products that I wouldn’t trust, and non-certified small farmers that I would trust, if I knew their story and methods. These people are usually on the local farmers markets, so you can ask them about it.
And organic from a small local farmer or your neighbour’s backyard, is of course not the same type of organic as the huge industrialised supermarket organic.
But it will still be organic, meaning that it will guarantee less chemical products, pesticides, harmful ingredients, synthetic additives, animal harm and environmental pollution. And it generally has more vitamins and minerals and taste better too.
So, YES, organic is better.